“Game-Changer in Gender Identity: Court Decision Sparks Heated Debate on Female-Only Spaces”
“I know that I can now get on with the rest of my life and have a coffee down the road with my friends, play hockey with my team and put this horribleness behind me.”
Interviews conducted by the Australian network Channel 9 in the aftermath of the decision had lawyers explain that the judgment is ultimately based on “30 years of legal precedent” that allow transgender women to have the same treatment as biological women when it comes to these issues.
Sall Grover announced her intentions of appealing the decision on the Australian High Court, denying she had been found guilty of discrimination against a woman due to her refusal to address Tickle as such
Image credits: andrew gold | heretics.
For Grover, on the other hand, the decision was expected, but ultimately disappointing.
“Unfortunately, we got the judgment we anticipated. The fight for women’s rights continues,” the owner wrote on X.
Grover, who identifies as a Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF), maintained her stance on social media and stated that the case’s result ultimately infringes on biological women’s spaces.
View this post on Instagram
“I’m being taken to federal court by a man who claims to be a woman because he wants to use a woman-only space I created,” she wrote back in November 2023.
“There isn’t a woman in the world who’d have to take me to court to use this woman only space. It takes a man for this case to exist.”
The app owner believes the court’s ruling was done with ulterior motives, particularly political ones
Image credits: Giggle
