“Hollywood Showdown: Justin Baldoni Dares to Defy Blake Lively’s Gag Order Demands in Explosive Legal Battle!”
In the dizzying world of celebrity lawsuits, nothing seems off the table, and the recent legal tussle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni is certainly no exception! You might wonder, can a gag order really silence a lawyer? It appears that’s the heated question at the center of this escalating drama. Recently, Lively’s team fired off a request to bar Baldoni’s attorney from making any media appearances, branding it an “intimidation tactic.” But wait, that’s not all; Baldoni’s team quickly countered, insisting that such a request is merely a smokescreen. As the stakes get higher—with accusations flying and claims of civil extortion exceeding $400 million—the show must go on… or does it? Join me as we dissect this twisted tale of fame, fortune, and courtroom theatrics! To dive deeper into this captivating saga, click here: LEARN MORE.
The heated case of Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni is getting more complicated after the latter’s team fired back at Lively for requesting a gag order against their lawyer, calling it an “intimidation tactic.”
Three days ago on January 21, the legal team of Lively and Ryan Reynolds put in a request to Judge Lewis J. Liman, asking to prohibit Bryan Freedman from talking to the media. This demand was made after he released unedited It Ends With Us footage to “refute Ms. Lively’s characterization of his behavior.”
- Baldoni’s team calls Lively’s request for a gag order against their lawyer an “intimidation tactic.”
- Freedman’s actions were deemed necessary to protect Baldoni, as per his legal team.
- Baldoni accused Lively and Ryan Reynolds of civil extortion and defamation seeking at least $400M in damages.
- Initial Pretrial Conference set for February 12, 2025, unless more claims are made.
Baldoni’s legal team is firing back after Lively’s gag order demand against his lawyer
Image credits: Nathan Congleton/Getty Images
“As Ms. Lively’s counsel have attempted, repeatedly, to caution Mr. Freedman, federal litigation must be conducted in court and according to the relevant rules of professional conduct,” the letter from Lively’s team demanded, asking for a gag order.
Post Comment