You Won’t Believe What These Anarchists Just Said About Statists—61 Posts That Will Blow Your Mind!
Politics—always the favorite dinner party topic nobody actually wants to talk about, right? But let’s be honest, if the internet didn’t have heated debates over government overreach, economic policies, or whether your neighbor’s cousin’s brother-in-law is a secret socialist—or worse yet, a statist—what would we do with all our free time? In a country like the U.S., where nearly half of the population chats politics with their social circles, the clash between those who want the government pulling the strings and those who think any government is just too much, is as real as your morning coffee. Enter the subreddit “[Stuff] Statists Say,” a digital roast fest where the anarchists mock the politically enthused government lovers with some of the sharpest, funniest jabs you’ll see online. Ready for a wild ride through the best of these internet zingers? Buckle up—it’s a no-holds-barred tour of political banter at its most chaotic and entertaining. LEARN MORE
People disagree about politics. What would they argue about on the Internet if not the political and economic state of the world? That sometimes seeps into meatspace, too. In the U.S., for example, 45% of Americans say they talk about politics with most of their social networks.
A big debate people have around politics is often how much government should be involved in people’s lives. Statists would say that a lot, while anti-statists believe that no government – left, right, or centrist – should be in charge.
The subreddit “[Stuff] Statists Say” is dedicated to roasting governmantalists for their political takes. And here we present to you the top posts these internet anarchists have shared over the years.
More info: Reddit
I See The Leftists Are Still Confusing Net Worth With Cash
Posts like that are the explanation for why 20% of the US population has nothing in retirement and no savings account and 58% have less than $1k saved.
Daily_the_Project21:
Doesn’t that just create an incentive to not make more than $999 million? Wouldn’t Bezos just sell all his shares, cause the stock to go crashing causing a ripple effect of panic selling, f**k the whole market and economy, and then retire somewhere where none of this matters to him? That’s what I’d do.
FBI Break Into Man’s Home Over Lawful Purchases And Statists Cheer
Just have government break into everyone’s house and steal s**t, totally cool.
SusanRosenberg:
This is the exact thing that makes me worried about my farm being registered with the USDA.
Mods Aren’t Part Of The 14%
Thread
Survey Results
Survey Data
Anon:
Holy s**t they’re actually insane.
“14.2% of people believe free speech should all be protected. Why is that?”
“My guess is that a lot of people haven’t really put that much thought into it beyond that it allows f*scists a platform.”
What.
Although those who say they are liberal or very liberal are in the minority, it’s still the highest percentage in a long time. In 1992, only 17% of Americans said they were liberals. The percentage of Americans identifying as conservatives has been steady since 1992, when it was 36%.
Still, both conservatives’ and liberals’ ideologies are at their most extreme in 30 years. 24% of Republicans claim they are ‘very conservative,’ and 18% of Democrats say they are ‘very liberal.’
Government Enforced Monopoly? Must Be Capitalism
IP laws aren’t a free market. They are, by definition, a government granted monopoly. While there is ample debate about whether and to what extent IP law and/or its individual components (eg, patent, copyright, trade mark, trade secret) helps or hinders the economy as a whole, it’s still a government granted monopoly.
nosmokingbandit:
Any jerk can file a suit against any other jerk for literally any reason. The ability to sue means nothing. We should save our outrage until the ruling.
Come Again?
“Civil liberties lobby” that’s a ridiculous way of saying people who value individual liberties.
He Should Be Forced To Give Away More!
If I was a billionaire, I wouldn’t donate s**t to anybody. I would still be hated the exact same but have an extra $100 million in wealth.
Anon (OP):
If I were a billionaire I would donate because I want to. It’s not morally Okay to force someone to distribute their wealth on the other hand. There is a difference between donation and forced distribution and that difference is consent.
Related Posts
You May Have Missed
gbs LEGAL LOOTING GIVEAWAY
WIN $500 OF SHOPPING!
This will close in 0 seconds
Post Comment