Why Did Californians Say No to Soaking the Super-Rich?

Why Did Californians Say No to Soaking the Super-Rich?

If you ever needed proof that California is where common sense and chaos sit down for a latté, just look at the latest wealthy-versus-not-quite-that-wealthy drama at the polls . Billionaires sweating over a 5% one-time tax? Voters said, “Not in my portfolio, pal!”—and dashed the dreams of what could’ve been the nation’s first wealth tax faster than you can say “Silicon Valley IPO” . There’s something oddly delightful (or just dizzying) about watching regular folks worried a wealth tax might hit them, too—right after scrimping for oat milk at Whole Foods . Was this a bold stand for free market valiance, or is California still just allergic to a little trickle-down panic? The ballots have spoken, but has anyone really answered the only question that matters: When’s the next billionaire bake sale? LEARN MORE

California voters rejected a ballot measure to impose a one-time, 5% tax on the net worth of billionaires in the state, defeating what would have been the nation’s first wealth tax. What do you think?

“I tried to vote yes, but a guy kept holding up a picture of my infant son and shaking his head.”

Gage Voelker, Book Burner


“Now we just sit back and relax as the billionaires return the favor.”

Tom Reiman, Screw Threader


“A wealth tax sounds nice in theory, but who’s going to pay for it?”

Jane Pienta, Sign Language Enthusiast

Post Comment

WIN $500 OF SHOPPING!

    This will close in 0 seconds

    RSS
    Follow by Email